Big Claims, Small Margins: Do Reported GraphLLM Gains Survive Simple Baselines?
arXiv:2610.28714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based methods for node classification on text-attributed graphs (TAGs) routinely report state-of-the-art accuracy. We ask how these results compare with inexpensive baselines run on the same splits. On the splits of three recent studies, we tune four baseline representatives with validation-only selection and compare them with the highest mean that each paper reports for an LLM-based method in the matched setting. Correct & Smooth on TF-IDF features trails this reference by a median of 2.3 percentage points, and an MLP on frozen e5-large-v2 e
阅读原文 · arXiv 机器学习本文由 SoccerDream AI 自动聚合索引，内容版权归原作者与 arXiv 机器学习 所有。
本站仅作技术动态聚合，不构成任何形式的建议。
本站仅作技术动态聚合，不构成任何形式的建议。