Who May Overrule the Agent? Evidence-Gated Authority in LLM Review Institutions
arXiv:2611.05390v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent language-model systems often add a reviewer to improve an upstream agent's decision. Yet a reviewer can both repair errors and replace decisions that were already correct. We study this as a problem of institutional jurisdiction: conditional on the same proposal, task information, model, and review output, when is the reviewer authorized to make its recommendation binding? We compare broad override authority with an evidence gate that permits replacement only after the reviewer produces a mechanically valid record of a binding-constra
阅读原文 · arXiv 人工智能本文由 SoccerDream AI 自动聚合索引，内容版权归原作者与 arXiv 人工智能 所有。
本站仅作技术动态聚合，不构成任何形式的建议。
本站仅作技术动态聚合，不构成任何形式的建议。